NASA gives us nothing......again

Never A Straight Answer......again

“One of these days Alice, POW, to the moon.”—Ralph Kramden

If you can make any sense out of what they said I’d like to hear it. I read what they said, read what others thought they said and I don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about. Lacking spatial resolution, temporary coincident with UAP’s initially detected via other methods, hampered by poor sensor calibration, robust systematic data acquisition with the whole of government, important to detect UAP’s with well calibrated sensors but all they have is poor. Translation: Give us more $$$$$$$

Multispecrtral or hyperspectral data as rigorous data acquisition campaign, AI and ML are essential tools, powerful techniques will only work on well characterized data gathered with respect to strong standards of which they don’t possess, collecting data from the public is critical, tap into their smart phones and steal video and images off their phones and them delete video’s and images, develop a Federal system for it, UAP’s present a threat to U.S. airspace—it’s self evident, 100,000 reports per year, FAA should turn over all information to NASA in real time. Source.

NASA debunk:

Subscriber sent this to me this morning. Confirms my belief that the Onion’s version of the moon landing is real.